Skip to content

Release 0.2.5 #255

Closed
gubaidulinvadim wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release_0.2.5
Closed

Release 0.2.5 #255
gubaidulinvadim wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release_0.2.5

Conversation

@gubaidulinvadim
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gubaidulinvadim gubaidulinvadim commented May 4, 2026

New Features

  • ConfigurationManager — explicit multi-step build flow for accelerator configuration; supports REST as a config source
  • YellowPages — standardised element name mapping/discovery with query support
  • UnboundElement — validation and support for unbound element configuration
  • CfgDict — allows plain dicts in config (pydantic-compatible)
  • MeasurementTool / TuningTool base classes — unified interface for tuning/measurement
  • TuneResponseMatrix / ChromaticityResponseMatrix — new RM tools for tune and chromaticity
  • RF orbit correction — RF frequency as a correction variable in orbit tools
  • Wildcards & regex in YAML array definitions (~ for exclusion); also Python-based macros via elements_code
  • ATuneMonitor diagnostics class
  • Shared Tango attribute state in dummy control system
  • Automatic versioning (version from build)
  • OphydDevice example added

Bug Fixes

  • LinearSerializedMagnetModel: fixed 4 AttributeError bugs (wrong field names / misplaced attribute access)
  • Serialised magnets: fixed sub-magnet list, strength computation (returns per-magnet + sum)
  • Private peer access cleaned up to use public property
  • Factory error reporting fixed (with line numbers)
  • Chromaticity tool fixes
  • ignore_external flag fix
  • YAML list expansion fix
  • UnboundElement config validation
  • Discrepancies between tuning and measurement tools
  • Averaging bug fix in bc3aa8d

Refactoring / Cleanup

  • ResponseMatrix renamed to ResponseMatrixData; OrbitResponseMatrixData added
  • Renamed input_/output_ → variable_/observable_ (AT naming convention)
  • Unified orbit/tune response matrix architecture
  • Removed factory custom strategy
  • get_peer() renamed to get_peer_name() for clarity
  • Peer added to ElementHolder
  • Ruff line limit raised to 127; reformatted codebase
  • ElementHolder discovery methods are made protected

Examples & Docs

  • SOLEIL: split config into devices.yaml, arrays.yaml, tuning_tools.yaml; added orbit correction notebook
  • BESSY2: updated to new API
  • ESRF: added dispersion correction and weight-scan examples
  • CONTRIBUTING.md updated for release workflow

@gubaidulinvadim
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gubaidulinvadim commented May 11, 2026

Could someone review this? @TeresiaOlsson @kparasch @GamelinAl It's just a changelog to make a new release. JLP create a 0.2.5 tag but I don't think it was actually released. There's no release on GitHub and I quickly checked that pip install 0.1.1 version (which is very wrong)

@TeresiaOlsson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TeresiaOlsson commented May 12, 2026

There is a release of version 0.2.5 on PyPi from 4 May: https://pypi.org/project/accelerator-middle-layer/

As far as I know our Github workflows don't make release notes or releases on Github. They only build and publish the package to PyPi. I think that is an issue and should be fixed. A proper release workflow should make a release on Github first and then publish to PyPi. In issue #210 I had to make the release on Github manually.

So perhaps you can add the missing part in the workflow as part of this PR?

@TeresiaOlsson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TeresiaOlsson commented May 12, 2026

I think it's also not a good solution to have a CHANGELOG.md file. It is better to have Github automatically generate the release notes or alternatively have the workflow make a draft and then add the changelog manually to the release notes. The changelog is then part of the release and not a file that needs to be kept in version control and manually updated every time a release is done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kparasch kparasch Awaiting requested review from kparasch

@TeresiaOlsson TeresiaOlsson Awaiting requested review from TeresiaOlsson

@gupichon gupichon Awaiting requested review from gupichon

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gubaidulinvadim @TeresiaOlsson